Building or Destroying Team Spirit: did Christian Horner make the right decision for Red Bull Racing?

July 12, 2010

RBR Team Principal Christian Horner (left) alongside team owner Dietrich Mateschitz

I think Christian Horner is one of the best Team Principals we have seen for some time in F1, but even he is having his work cut out to try and damp down the increasingly problematic relationship between the two Red Bull Racing Drivers, something which the media are having a field day in trying to flare up further. The one issue that effects a driver more than any other is the belief that their team mate is getting preferential equipment. After he had taken over the Brabham team in 1972 Bernie Ecclestone had to solve a problem where his two drivers, then Graham Hill and Carlos Reutemann, both believed the other was getting a more powerful version of the Cosworth engine, so Mr E. resolved the debate in his own inimitable style – he tossed a coin for each race and got the drivers to call as to who got which engine – problem solved! However, in the F1 of today the incessant rate of development, and lack of testing opportunities means that situations often arise when hard decisions have to be made as to who gets what. Christian Horner’s challenge could not, unfortunately, be solved by tossing a coin.

Red Bull Racing had come to Silverstone with two new specification front wings, one of these failed during practice when it was fitted to Vettel’s car, meaning that only one new wing was available for two competitive drivers and cars for qualifying and then the race, when no further changes are allowed to be made. Christian Horner was therefore left with three options, 1) replace Vettel’s broken wing with a ‘old spec’ wing and keep Webber’s car fitted with the new one. 2) swop the wings giving Vettel the top spec wing and replacing Webber’s with an old spec one or 3) replace Webber’s new spec wing with an old wing so that both drivers had equal equipment. McLaren boss, Martin Whitmarsh, who never misses an opportunity to pour oil on a troubled rival (remember his interview on the BBC after the Red Bull driver collision in Istanbul?) was very clear on the McLaren position as quoted by James Allen on his site, http://www.jamesallenonf1.com: “I think if you are in a very strong position then even more cause to be as fair as you are with the drivers, the cohesiveness of the team is such that you don’t need to set up those kinds of tensions and if you are in a strong position you need to be careful to hold it together.” So he goes for option 3 then – the team harmony choice, although, to be honest, I’m not sure Mark Webber would have seen it that way. I would have thought the Webber would have gone for number one – the ‘keep things as they are’ choice – using the ‘it’s on my car so leave it there’ logic. This would have kept Adrian Newey happy, he would have felt that the McLaren option would have lost the chance for the wing to be tried out in race conditions, and given the lack of opportunities to test such components this was an imperative for continuing to improve the performance of the car. So Christian had to make a decision and he decided for Option 2, which pretty much made Webber incandescent and led him to comment that he would have not re-signed his contract for 2011 if he’d known he would have been treated thus. However I suspect Webber would have been just as unhappy if he’d been forced to run an old wing for the sake of fairness, and this would have meant RBR would have lost a valuable opportunity to run the new wing. So in the end we have an unhappy Webber who dominated the British Grand Prix and underlined the supremecy of the Red Bull, we have a team who now have more data on their new wing and who have now set a clear and explicit basis for priority – whoever is leading in the drivers’ championship, and of course this is now Mark Webber, so maybe things will calm down sooner than the press would like. On balance I think Christian made a good decision and perhaps most importantly, he made it openly and defended in openly, and as long as he now sticks to this, team spirit in RBR may just be saved.

 The final point however is that it is two McLaren, not Red Bull, drivers who are now leading the championship, and if we look back to 2007 we may recall how Kimi Raikkonen took the world championship from the feuding Hamilton and Alonso. We are now just over half way, with nine races remaining, if RBR aren’t able to resolve these tensions in a productive way then this could be another year in which internal competition got the better of collaboration and destroyed team performance.

Advertisements

8 Responses to “Building or Destroying Team Spirit: did Christian Horner make the right decision for Red Bull Racing?”

  1. Gareth Howells Says:

    Thanks Prof. Interesting article as usual. You mention there were, effectively, 2 choices. Why then couldn’t Christian Horner’s challenge be solved with the toss of a coin then (heads = choice 1,tails = choice 2,both drivers watching)?

    Gareth H

    • Mark Says:

      Dear Gareth, you’re absolutely right. In fact Ted Kravitz has made the same suggestion on the BBC site, and even said that they should have made a big thing about with the media watching. It just goes to show – Bernie really does have all the answers!

  2. sdsadad Says:

    Wow!
    Are you Austrian or German or just plain crazy!

  3. Mark Says:

    Hello, I’m afraid I misunderstood your request – which I thought was a link to my blog, I was not aware that you would post the articles on your site, by all means link to my blog, but please do not reproduce my articles on your site.

  4. juan Says:

    Good article of you wrote it ;-). I think f1jobs.com advertised for a writer lately 😉

  5. F1 Maniac Says:

    Hi Prof

    Has your opinion changed since Webber has now seemingly backtracked on some of the issues by saying the comments were in the heat of the moment etc.

    Do you think he has over-reacted or was prompted by management into backing down?

    • Mark Says:

      Hi Maniac

      Thanks for the comment. I think it’s probably a bit of both. Mark is a bright guy and I’m sure on reflection probably feels he pushed things a little too far, particularly with his comments about signing for the team, but similarly the management (Christian Horner in this case) have said that they regretted not informing Mark of the change before it was made. Let’s hope they get things back on an even keel, as this really is their season to lose.

  6. muaz Says:

    I misunderstood, im really sorry prof, I bring it down. Thnaks and Im sorrt again


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: